Dismissal of Criminal Charges

by | Jun 18, 2019 | Blog Posts, NC Criminal Defense, SC Criminal Defense

Often, when calling us a for the first time, clients summarize what they have been charged with and what special circumstances they think they have, and they sometimes end the conversation by saying “I want this dismissed”.  Well of course they want it dismissed, who doesn’t?  That’s like saying “I don’t want to go to jail” (which is something else that clients tell us all the time).  We know these things and we will do our best to accomplish these goals but it is not always that simple.  Specifically, with regards to dismissing charges, that is something that a criminal defense attorney can make an argument for, but we don’t the power to get it done unilaterally. That ability is left to the prosecutor and the judge.

In this blog, we will talk about dismissals in criminal cases and how they can be achieved. Like all of our blogs this is intended for educational purposes only, and not intended as a substitute for the advice and counsel of a criminal defense attorney.

Dismissal of criminal charges before trial

As we have stated many times before, there are three ways a criminal case will end: through a dismissal, through a plea bargain, or through a criminal trial. Specifically, with a dismissal, the prosecutor has the authority to dismiss a case if he or she feels that the state does not have enough evidence to eventually obtain a conviction.  A criminal defense attorneys’ role in this process may be to try to make an argument to convince the prosecutor that they don’t have enough evidence to obtain a conviction.

Other times, dismissals can be obtained pre-trial through some deferred prosecution or conditional discharge programs available to the defendant.

Barring one of the two above-mentioned scenarios, your criminal charges are not going to be dismissed simply because you want them to be.

Dismissal of criminal charges once a trial has begun

As part of a criminal trial, the defense can ask the judge to grant a dismissal at the appropriate time. This can be done twice –  at the close of the state’s evidence and then again at the close of the defense’s evidence.  The dismissal can be granted based on two different legal theories 1. Insufficiency of the evidence 2. Variance.

Insufficiency of the evidence

  • I dismissal for insufficiency of the evidence should be granted upon motion by the defense if, as a matter of law, there was not sufficient evidence presented on the elements charged to support submission to the jury. In this case, submission to the Jury would violate the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and Article I, section 19 of the North Carolina Constitution.


  • A dismissal for variance should be granted upon motion by the defense if there is a variance between crime alleged in the indictment and any crime for which the state’s evidence may have been sufficient to warrant submission to the jury and that submission to the jury would therefore violate the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteen Amendments of the United States Constitution and Article I Sections, 19, 23 and 24 of the North Carolina constitution.

If you have been charged with a crime and need legal representation, contact us.  At Gilles Law, we handle both state and federal criminal charges in North Carolina and South Carolina.

DISCLAIMER – This forum is intended for general questions and comments about the particular law or topic. Comments are public and are not protected by confidentiality or attorney-client privilege; therefore, they can be used against you in court. Please refrain from revealing your identify or specifics about any actual criminal case. No attorney-client relationship is created in this forum.

Call Now Button